forums

Emory Williams [Not in portal]

Calinative said:
No I meant I don't care about the 'omg we need a top backup or qb3 just in case' aspect. Whether it's person A or B sure I want the best person possible, but we need a person regardless. And again it's NOT taking away roster spots which was the big thing previously with a guy like Judd. If we were at 85 Id agree with you. Or if I actually thought Judd was making any money...

I think no matter what we need 4-5 QBs on this roster. also I am not so against a guy with less talent but is smart to be in the QB room. NFL does that all the time for a reason. That imo can absolutely be where Emory has value. But that guy has to also be cheap.

I get you think Emory and Judd will never be anything playable but that isn't necessarily fact or means they're completely useless on the roster. Judd does have talent. Will he ever be startable for us, probably not.
Click to expand...
"Emory has value."
"Judd does have talent."
Come On Please GIF by NBA
 
Advertisement
Calinative said:
No I meant I don't care about the 'omg we need a top backup or qb3 just in case' aspect. Whether it's person A or B sure I want the best person possible, but we need a person regardless. And again it's NOT taking away roster spots which was the big thing previously with a guy like Judd. If we were at 85 Id agree with you. Or if I actually thought Judd was making any money...

I think no matter what we need 4-5 QBs on this roster. also I am not so against a guy with less talent but is smart to be in the QB room. NFL does that all the time for a reason. That imo can absolutely be where Emory has value. But that guy has to also be cheap.

I get you think Emory and Judd will never be anything playable but that isn't necessarily fact or means they're completely useless on the roster. Judd does have talent. Will he ever be startable for us, probably not.
Click to expand...
What evidence is there that either Emory or Judd will ever be playable?

Judd has talent, but is still battling it out with Luke Nickel for QB3 & has no shot to be QB2 even if Emory leaves...
 
Memnon said:
Nothing gets Canes fans more riled up than discarding players who shouldn't even be here in the first place.

The attachment this fanbase has to mediocrity is really something that should be studied.

I blame the Folden era mostly.
Click to expand...
they gladly kick off Carr but hold onto Judd for dear life lol
 
Calinative said:
No I meant I don't care about the 'omg we need a top backup or qb3 just in case' aspect. Whether it's person A or B sure I want the best person possible, but we need a person regardless. And again it's NOT taking away roster spots which was the big thing previously with a guy like Judd. If we were at 85 Id agree with you. Or if I actually thought Judd was making any money...

I think no matter what we need 4-5 QBs on this roster. also I am not so against a guy with less talent but is smart to be in the QB room. NFL does that all the time for a reason. That imo can absolutely be where Emory has value. But that guy has to also be cheap.

I get you think Emory and Judd will never be anything playable but that isn't necessarily fact or means they're completely useless on the roster. Judd does have talent. Will he ever be startable for us, probably not.
Click to expand...
what actual value does emory have? he isnt smart on the field. hes not athletic. hes not physically gifted.

he can stay on the team if he becomes a walk on and pays his way otherwise go back to Milton
 
hoops156 said:
what actual value does emory have? he isnt smart on the field. hes not athletic. hes not physically gifted.

he can stay on the team if he becomes a walk on and pays his way otherwise go back to Milton
Click to expand...
Notice how you added smart "On the field" there? You think NFL teams keep signing Veteran Qbs who have proven they absolutely suck on the field time after time to be backups because they are smart on the field, or off it?
 
cway313 said:
You are sick.
Click to expand...
For pointing out exactly what billion dollar valued NFL teams do, but somehow we're too good to do? lol and in the NFL they deem it's worth it even though they have a far stricter roster limit than we have to deal with. Meanwhile they have Actual QB coaches while our Qb coach is also the OC. So do I think it's valuable to have smart backup Qbs in the room if they are cheap and not taking up scholarships needed by others? yes. How valuable? Probably not the most. Better to have them than just not have anyone at all and go into the season with 3 Qbs or fewer? yes.
 
Advertisement
Calinative said:
Notice how you added smart "On the field" there? You think NFL teams keep signing Veteran Qbs who have proven they absolutely suck on the field time after time to be backups because they are smart on the field, or off it?
Click to expand...
I have no evidence that hes smart off the field judging by the way he prepped for games
 
hoops156 said:
you know for a fact Judd isnt making money? they're all getting some sort of deal. at this point, hes taking away money from someone else
Click to expand...
He's probably making much less than a replacement would make that you add from the portal. Thats the point.
 
hoops156 said:
I have no evidence that hes smart off the field judging by the way he prepped for games
Click to expand...
Does that same thought process apply to anyone that is good off the field but bad on the field? like what... How many coaches were bad players?
 
Calinative said:
He's probably making much less than a replacement would make that you add from the portal. Thats the point.
Click to expand...
hes going to leave regardless (I.e. getting pushed out next year). may as well speed that process up. if we actually have to get to Judd in season, it means everything went wrong
 
hoops156 said:
hes going to leave regardless (I.e. getting pushed out next year). may as well speed that process up.
Click to expand...
... If we have someone to replace him. You know I already said If you get a replacement, I'm fine. I'm just saying I'd rather keep Judd as QB4 than not have a Qb4. It's pretty logical.

Also who's pushing him out next year? Only 2 Qbs that are for sure on roster next year are Nickel and Coleman. We going to add another portal guy? or 2nd HS QB? (We should get 2 HS guys every year at this point btw!). Either way we're going to need a QB 4 lol. Unless you think we're adding 3 QBs next offseason, which I doubt.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top