Deflection/Perfection/Reflection

reg

Sophomore
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
3,842
I don't know if I've ever heard an excuse as bad as Richt's deflection of "If all 11 players do their job, the play will work." Forget about the fact that it is blatantly obvious that Richt is shifting the blame by throwing his players under the bus. That is not the point that I am making here, considering that the point has been well documented by many posters on this board. I am more focused and concerned about the fact that Richt actually believes his statement to be true.

First of all, Richt's statement is set on a foundation of delusion and is layered with hypocrisy....
The delusion: Regardless of the profession or task, it is impossible for anyone to do their job perfectly, 100% of the time. Any CEO, Director, or even a Manager, knows that mistakes are inevitable. That is why bonuses, raises, prizes, and other incentives are always used to create "high performances." If you give one player a solo assignment and tell him to do it 100 times, he will not have a 100% success rate at said task. Human error validates this fact. Take that same player and ask him to complete a task that is connected to the tasks of 10 other individuals, who also are also limited by human error, then the probability of perfection or as Richt calls it, "doing your job 100%", decreases to the point of being not just being improbable, but impossible. That is why it is highly important for a CEO, Manager, or in this case, Coaches, to put their employees/players in positions of achieving success. If your objectives, plans, or plays are predicated upon perfection, then you don't have a plan, you have a dream! Human error should always be a constant variable in any game plan, regardless of the profession.
The Hypocrisy: Richts comment is literally the antithesis of the concept "team." If only one player misses an assignment of runs an incorrect route, the success rate of the play should not be a significant drop. If the plays are not working because players are not doing their job 100% of the time, it is because the coach didn't do his job 100% of the time to make sure that the players achieved perfection. Richt's plays commands such a high level of execution because of the basic nature of the play itself.

My biggest concern is the moral of the players. I honestly believe that there is nothing more detrimental to a players psyche, than to have them chase a goal that is literally unobtainable. Perfection is literally impossible. On top of not obtaining the goal of perfection that Richt demands of them, they have to hear their coach constantly say that it is the players fault for the lack of success. Creating high performance teams has little to do with the task at hand. It has more to do with creating an environment that exudes confidence so that "skill" is not as much as a factor as other traits/intangibles. This is how the "Virginia's" of the world can beat a team like Miami, or how Virginia Tech, Wisconsin, and the San Antonio Spurs consistently perform at a high level, even though their rosters are not as "skilled" as others.

How important is confidence to a player and to the success of a team? Look no further than the other side of the ball on our team. Our defense makes more mistakes than I care to think about. They constantly miss assignments in the secondary. Linebackers constantly are in the wrong gap. D-lineman constantly over pursue. In the mist of all of the imperfections, we have THE #1 DEFENSE in the country!!! It's not because our defensive players have more skill than our offensive players. If fact, most would argue that it is the opposite way around, with the offense actually having more talent overall. The defense has achieved such a high level of success because of their confidence, environment, and because their success ratio for any particular snap, does not depend on a perfect play being called.

Lastly, every thread on the board is getting derailed about talks of Miami needing an OC. The **** is not going to happen. For one, Richt truly believes that the cause of him being fired at UGA, was because he gave up play calling. He points to that moment as to when things began to spiral down at Georgia. Secondly, Richt does not believe that their is anything wrong with the plays or the calling of the plays. Richt is not giving up play calling. There is a better chance that Trayvon Martin's mother will have a sexual affair with George Zimmerman and then announce that George's d'ick was so magical, she has now agreed to become the spokesperson for the N.R.A.

The best we can hope for regarding our offensive scheme is that the fans can put enough pressure on Richt and James, that it will force Richt to attend certain clinics that are ran by the offensive geniuses of Pro Football, like the LA Rams, for example. I think Richt's ego is too big to seek advice from anyone in the college ranks. As stubborn as Richt is, he has at least shown in the past that he is willing to make changes (revamped the offense for Kayaa for the second part of the 2016 season). It is my hope that he will do the same for Perry, which will in turn allow our playmakers to f'ucking make plays.

Richt is similar to Coach Boone from "Remember the Titans." Coach Boone said, "This is no democracy. It is a dictatorship. I am the law!" Does that sound like anyone we know? Coach Boone also said, "We will be perfect in every aspect of the game......Perfection! Let's go to work" Boone's quotes are eerily similar to that of Richt's. Though the movie was based off of a true story, Boone's quotes, were still lines in a film; a fictional world, perhaps. Richt's world is a real one, but his expectations of perfection are from movie-land! Since the blame is being pushed on our players, if there is a quote from that movie that should play a role in Richt's daily routine with his team, it is......
tenor (20).gif
 
Advertisement
God's work, @reg!

I don't agree with everything, but definitely most. The thing I think is really missing is this simple fact: It doesn't matter how well you execute a play when the opponent knows what you are going to do and deploys all of their efforts to that point of attack. When UVA knows we run all verts on 3rd and 12, and they cover those all verts and leave underneath and the middle of the field wide open as a result, well, I guess sure, Superman could still execute in that situation. But when you put a first time starter in that situation, where the ONLY options you give him are ALL BAD options, and then you yank him for throwing a couple picks.... Maaannnn, fvck that guy. When you line up in a heavy I-set on 4th and short and the entire D crashes to the spot where they know the run is going to go, leaving everything else on the field wide open, you can't then say it's the players' fault for not executing the play.

It's like, if the United States wanted to invade Key West, yeah sure, we could tell the fine people of Key West exactly what our battle plans are and there's not much they could do about it. Change that to the invasion of Normandy during WWII, no matter how well the soldiers executed the plan, no matter how valiantly they fought, if Germany had known and been given the time to fortify the locations of the invasions, we'd all be speaking German right now. The element of surprise was as crucial then as it is on the football field now.

If Richt had come out after that game and said something along the lines of "This is all on me, we didn't have a good enough game plan and they were well prepared for everything we threw at them. We're going to get this fixed.", or anything along those lines, I might have some hope today. When he comes out and says "those plays have worked for 30 years and the players just didn't execute them right."? Maaaannnn, FVCK THAT GUY.

As it is, anyone thinking this situation can be fixed without either bringing in a fresh offensive perspective (even if Richt keeps calling the plays, as long as we have someone actually preparing a game plan and bringing some innovation to the table and in Richt's ear on game day about what play to call given the situation), or getting rid of Richt... well anyone thinking we can get this fixed without making serious changes is seriously just as delusional as Mark Richt.
 
I can tell u put time and thought into this. Especially the George Zimmerman/Trayvon’s mom reference. Kudos.

The rest is good too. I’m not sure if Recht actually expects perfection, or it’s just an easy excuse. Either way I guess the result is gonna be players and their parents whining on Twitter.
 
God's work, @reg!

I don't agree with everything, but definitely most. The thing I think is really missing is this simple fact: It doesn't matter how well you execute a play when the opponent knows what you are going to do and deploys all of their efforts to that point of attack. When UVA knows we run all verts on 3rd and 12, and they cover those all verts and leave underneath and the middle of the field wide open as a result, well, I guess sure, Superman could still execute in that situation. But when you put a first time starter in that situation, where the ONLY options you give him are ALL BAD options, and then you yank him for throwing a couple picks.... Maaannnn, fvck that guy. When you line up in a heavy I-set on 4th and short and the entire D crashes to the spot where they know the run is going to go, leaving everything else on the field wide open, you can't then say it's the players' fault for not executing the play.

It's like, if the United States wanted to invade Key West, yeah sure, we could tell the fine people of Key West exactly what our battle plans are and there's not much they could do about it. Change that to the invasion of Normandy during WWII, no matter how well the soldiers executed the plan, no matter how valiantly they fought, if Germany had known and been given the time to fortify the locations of the invasions, we'd all be speaking German right now. The element of surprise was as crucial then as it is on the football field now.

If Richt had come out after that game and said something along the lines of "This is all on me, we didn't have a good enough game plan and they were well prepared for everything we threw at them. We're going to get this fixed.", or anything along those lines, I might have some hope today. When he comes out and says "those plays have worked for 30 years and the players just didn't execute them right."? Maaaannnn, FVCK THAT GUY.

As it is, anyone thinking this situation can be fixed without either bringing in a fresh offensive perspective (even if Richt keeps calling the plays, as long as we have someone actually preparing a game plan and bringing some innovation to the table and in Richt's ear on game day about what play to call given the situation), or getting rid of Richt... well anyone thinking we can get this fixed without making serious changes is seriously just as delusional as Mark Richt.
Good point... richt prolly plays poker w his cards facing out.
 
God's work, @reg!

I don't agree with everything, but definitely most. The thing I think is really missing is this simple fact: It doesn't matter how well you execute a play when the opponent knows what you are going to do and deploys all of their efforts to that point of attack. When UVA knows we run all verts on 3rd and 12, and they cover those all verts and leave underneath and the middle of the field wide open as a result, well, I guess sure, Superman could still execute in that situation. But when you put a first time starter in that situation, where the ONLY options you give him are ALL BAD options, and then you yank him for throwing a couple picks.... Maaannnn, fvck that guy. When you line up in a heavy I-set on 4th and short and the entire D crashes to the spot where they know the run is going to go, leaving everything else on the field wide open, you can't then say it's the players' fault for not executing the play.

It's like, if the United States wanted to invade Key West, yeah sure, we could tell the fine people of Key West exactly what our battle plans are and there's not much they could do about it. Change that to the invasion of Normandy during WWII, no matter how well the soldiers executed the plan, no matter how valiantly they fought, if Germany had known and been given the time to fortify the locations of the invasions, we'd all be speaking German right now. The element of surprise was as crucial then as it is on the football field now.

If Richt had come out after that game and said something along the lines of "This is all on me, we didn't have a good enough game plan and they were well prepared for everything we threw at them. We're going to get this fixed.", or anything along those lines, I might have some hope today. When he comes out and says "those plays have worked for 30 years and the players just didn't execute them right."? Maaaannnn, FVCK THAT GUY.

As it is, anyone thinking this situation can be fixed without either bringing in a fresh offensive perspective (even if Richt keeps calling the plays, as long as we have someone actually preparing a game plan and bringing some innovation to the table and in Richt's ear on game day about what play to call given the situation), or getting rid of Richt... well anyone thinking we can get this fixed without making serious changes is seriously just as delusional as Mark Richt.
Good stuff! At this point, especially now that the news has come out about Rosier being announced the starter moving forward, I am over "logic", when it comes to Richt. Logic is not applicable when ego is involved; the two simply can't exist in the same space.
 
Good stuff! At this point, especially now that the news has come out about Rosier being announced the starter moving forward, I am over "logic", when it comes to Richt. Logic is not applicable when ego is involved; the two simply can't exist in the same space.

Holy crap I hadn't heard that. This is insane.

Maybe I'll pick up wood working. Sure frees up a lot of time when the weather is nice on fall Saturdays.
 
"How important is confidence to a player and to the success of a team? Look no further than the other side of the ball on our team. Our defense makes more mistakes than I care to think about. They constantly miss assignments in the secondary. Linebackers constantly are in the wrong gap. D-lineman constantly over pursue. In the mist of all of the imperfections, we have THE #1 DEFENSE in the country!!! It's not because our defensive players have more skill than our offensive players. If fact, most would argue that it is the opposite way around, with the offense actually having more talent overall. The defense has achieved such a high level of success because of their confidence, environment, and because their success ratio for any particular snap, does not depend on a perfect play being called."

Perfect! Right on the money big bro, that's exactly what's been the issue with this team since Richt has been here.

Defense carries the Offense & offense is asked to do the bare minimum, in the games where the offense can't even do that, the Defense elevates & plays above their means.

UNC in 2016, Pitt in 2017 & UVA this year are all the exact same games with the same symptoms that resulted in the same disappointing L.
 
I don't know if I've ever heard an excuse as bad as Richt's deflection of "If all 11 players do their job, the play will work." Forget about the fact that it is blatantly obvious that Richt is shifting the blame by throwing his players under the bus. That is not the point that I am making here, considering that the point has been well documented by many posters on this board. I am more focused and concerned about the fact that Richt actually believes his statement to be true.

Honestly, this right here is why I haven't been able to completely get over the UVA loss yet. It finally dawned on me yesterday that when CMR does film review, he doesn't ask himself whether the scheme and/or play call was right - he asks whether it was executed correctly. He makes an assumption that the play has and will always work; it merely requires the "right" players executing it "well" to work. That is completely flawed logic and it is exactly why we haven't seen change on the offensive side of the ball. To him, if the play doesn't work it will always come down to execution, not play calling and/or scheme.

^What I just wrote in the above paragraph really really scares me. It is the exact opposite direction of where modern offensive playcallers are going. The modern offensive play caller is innovative, flexible and schemes for the players he has and the defense he plays against. He doesn't set his scheme in stone and he sure as **** doesn't blame it on execution. We are treading in very dangerous waters here - Richt really needs to do a 180 on owning the offense and it needs to happen before 2019.
 
Advertisement
Richt is deflecting blame on the players just like Golden was. The thing is, those defenses that we are playing against have a coach as well. Everyone knows are tendencies and they are playing us based on that. Its insane to think that your plays are so great, that the other team can know the play and cant do a thing about if all players do their job. And if the other team knows the play, its basically impossible for our players to do their jobs successfully. CMR really needs to take a long look in the mirror.
 
"I don't know if I've ever heard an excuse as bad as Richt's deflection of "If all 11 players do their job, the play will work."

And then he has the stugatz to say "I don't blame the players".
 
Listen and listen clearly, Richt is here and only here to call plays because he missed it even though he sucked at it as the game has passed him by. If an OC in today day and age put up the stats or looked like we look on offense in year 3 he would be fired already.

He's also here to get his kid ahead start in his coaching career. I don't know who would be stupid enough to hire Richt jr. when our QB play is abysmal. When Richt Sr. is gone all those stolen paycheck Richt Jr. is getting will only amount to being a QB coach at Montana or Akron.
 
"Richt is similar to Coach Boone from "Remember the Titans." Coach Boone said, "This is no democracy. It is a dictatorship. I am the law!" Does that sound like anyone we know? Coach Boone also said, "We will be perfect in every aspect of the game......Perfection! Let's go to work" Boone's quotes are eerily similar to that of Richt's. Though the movie was based off of a true story, Boone's quotes, were still lines in a film; a fictional world, perhaps. Richt's world is a real one, but his expectations of perfection are from movie-land! Since the blame is being pushed on our players, if there is a quote from that movie that should play a role in Richt's daily routine with his team, it is......"


Boone also said the following:

"I run 6 plays. It's like novocaine. Give it time; it always works"
 
"Richt is similar to Coach Boone from "Remember the Titans." Coach Boone said, "This is no democracy. It is a dictatorship. I am the law!" Does that sound like anyone we know? Coach Boone also said, "We will be perfect in every aspect of the game......Perfection! Let's go to work" Boone's quotes are eerily similar to that of Richt's. Though the movie was based off of a true story, Boone's quotes, were still lines in a film; a fictional world, perhaps. Richt's world is a real one, but his expectations of perfection are from movie-land! Since the blame is being pushed on our players, if there is a quote from that movie that should play a role in Richt's daily routine with his team, it is......"


Boone also said the following:

"I run 6 plays. It's like novocaine. Give it time; it always works"
I missed that one....good catch!
 
Back
Top