- Joined
- Oct 2, 2017
- Messages
- 8,620
Mentioned the FSU-Clemson "partnership" before, but this comes from the Trailerhassee paper today:
"Clemson, which is in lockstep with FSU, also is pushing for change with revenue distribution within the ACC."
This would be the one and only time we should pursue a three-way with those two despicable programs.
So 3 vs. 11? Or even 6 vs 8? This is the same as the succession conversation. The majority of teams, who would be harmed by this, are not going to vote for anything that damages them financially, without consideration. They would probably ask for the GOR to be extended ANOTHER 25 years for them to accept an inequitable deal like this. LOL.
And inequitable conferences are a disaster.
Guys, any way you slice it, the whole situation is FUBAR. It's going to get really messy, there is no "answer" IMO. Each team has equal voting power, and there are more have-nots than haves.