forums

Can I say something?

caneULM said:
A lot on this board are concerned with the OL and the defense play as a whole and I get all that. My thing is is there really a reason to show everything against the quality of competition played so far?
Click to expand...

Please stop using logic and reason. This board is for the knee knocking scaredy cats who live and die by emotions only.
 
Well, we haven't been tested yet and this is college football where you build a team that will disintegrate unlike the pros where you get to keep talent, so you don't know what you are until you get tested and last year is meaningless. Our early schedule has not been and won't be a true test and it looks like Clemson won't be. fsu might be simply because of the rivalry but they look bad. ND seems to be our only legitimate test yet we have time to coach up our backups and youth before we go there. We only know what we know and we don’t know what we don't know so give it time and enjoy the games like these first two have been. Domination and winning is what I expect since I’ve never seen a 90 percent completion QB against any opponent and a WR that catches EVERYTHING thrown at him. That has been unreal!
 
fraggle said:
Well, we haven't been tested yet and this is college football where you build a team that will disintegrate unlike the pros where you get to keep talent, so you don't know what you are until you get tested and last year is meaningless. Our early schedule has not been and won't be a true test and it looks like Clemson won't be. fsu might be simply because of the rivalry but they look bad. ND seems to be our only legitimate test yet we have time to coach up our backups and youth before we go there. We only know what we know and we don’t know what we don't know so give it time and enjoy the games like these first two have been. Domination and winning is what I expect since I’ve never seen a 90 percent completion QB against any opponent and a WR that catches EVERYTHING thrown at him. That has been unreal!
Click to expand...
I think Clemson will tell us what we need to know about the oline atleast.. Maybe I just hope it does..
 
Freedom of speech. But topics to avoid around me. Trashing Luke Nickel because he threw a pick against Stanford, trashing a walk on for fumbling in a 77-0 game, and cheap booze.
 
caneULM said:
A lot on this board are concerned with the OL and the defense play as a whole and I get all that. My thing is is there really a reason to show everything against the quality of competition played so far?
Click to expand...
this is a real slippery slope. for years we said this and the lines were what they were. does it look like we are holding back, or hiding stuff, on offense?
 
I think the staff unanimously decided to stay vanilla on both sides. This sheet is chess.
 
1789148328965.png
 
caneULM said:
A lot on this board are concerned with the OL and the defense play as a whole and I get all that. My thing is is there really a reason to show everything against the quality of competition played so far?
Click to expand...
What have they shown?! Should they just not play at all?? Lol
 
Shooter McGavin said:
Freedom of speech. But topics to avoid around me. Trashing Luke Nickel because he threw a pick against Stanford, trashing a walk on for fumbling in a 77-0 game, and cheap booze.
Click to expand...
Now I was one who said Nickel would probably not be a starter here. As for trashing him or any other player, that's just something I don't do for real.
 
caneULM said:
Now I was one who said Nickel would probably not be a starter here. As for trashing him or any other player, that's just something I don't do for real.
Click to expand...
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing on this but people basically wrote the guy off after 6 career pass attempts going into yesterday. **** there was one guy who was trashing him from last year. FYI he threw one ******* pass in 2025 lol. I've said this multiple times, I know it's FAMU but he looked very capable yesterday. Better than any backup qb who has come through here in a while.
 
Back
Top