And a bunch of you are against a banner.

DaveT

Freshman
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
455
Yep, a banner is really going to hurt recruiting....not watching the coaching...especially the soft, non-adjusted D full of players who looked to be coached not to use arms to tackle.

SMH

Hopefully you've gotten your sight back.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
There should be a banner fund perpetually run, and the banner should be flown as many calendar days as possible till the worthless **** takes his talent back to a mid tier Mac team.
 
I'm still against a banner. Does nothing but waste money and embarrass the school.

See, this is the issue -- sometimes embarrassment is needed to make changes for the better. No one likes to be embarrassed, right? And what do you do when you are in situations like this? Make changes to try to prevent it from happening again. It might happen, don't get me wrong, but you at least do something to try to prevent it.

We have the talent. And don't play like we do. Mainly on D as usual.
 
Advertisement
I'm still against a banner. Does nothing but waste money and embarrass the school.

And what the **** is wrong with that? That's the only way these ******** act.

Fly that ****...twice. It needs to go beyond that...anything that embarasses them or puts extra pressure needs to happen.
 
They're against the banner but not against the coach who costs Miami wins and recruits.
 
Will the banner tell Duke to hold on to the fcking ball when we're trying to go in for a 3rd quarter lead?
 
Advertisement
I'm still against a banner. Does nothing but waste money and embarrass the school.

If the school is not embarrassed yet by the play on the field, we should let them know their alumni and fans are.

And I don't care about how it hurts recruiting either. The kids are better off going somewhere else as long as Golden is the coach. He'll waste their talent and ruin their draft potential. Allen Hurns and Seantrel Henderson are two shining examples of that.
 
Back
Top