DerekDohrman
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
- Messages
- 2,772
That fat piece of **** can't even keep his lies straight. If we were truly at 70 scholarships last season that means we could have counted 7 of the 9 scholarships dinged by the NCAA last year. And you know what that means? We'd only need to count 1 this year.
So if he's really trying to convince simpletons that you need to have 85 scholarship guys every year to succeed then why is he under 84 this year? Fact is that almost no program is ever at 85. And it has nothing to do with NCAA sanctions.
Everything is a smoke screen with that slob to continue his media agenda about the devastating effects of the cloud. And simps keep eating it up even though the scholarship dings by the NCAA were a complete nonfactor. All of those 9 dings will have been covered by Folden's record level attrition
exactly. thats the thing that bugs me the most. We NEVER had restrictions on our incoming class. We were always allowed to take the max of 25/yr. our only limitations were on our 85 number, which means we couldve done 82/82/82 for three years...been NO worse off than most teams because, as you said, most teams are ALWAYS under the 85 number by at least a few.
as for the playing the freshman thing. im fine with it. get them in some game action, see who can help your team and see who cant, then manage the medical shirts appropriately. first couple games are a great opportunity to see who can shine under the bright lights.