a sure fire way to get fired

Screenshot_20260831_152013_ESPN.jpg


A perfect example of why you can't always use what scouts & GM's say as a final barometer.

The lack of production + the tape over the 3 year timespan doesn't say anything close to a 1st rounder.

But because Oh ST WR's have had so much success in the league, some front office dork will think that it means that all their WR's are like that.

It's the classic Correlation - Causation fallacy.
 
This guy can go **** himself. Not the dude who made the tweet at Rookie Watch - he's just a dunce. Brandon Inniss. This MF has clowned us and talked **** about us from when he was in high school. I normally couldn't give a **** about what these S Florida divas do when they leave to another school. This guy though? Talking all that **** and sucking like a crack whooore jonesing for a fix? Nah.. Kick Rocks Inniss. And eat a **** too.
 
Don’t forget that some NFL scout watched our game against OSU and still recommended that a team draft Carnell Lake number 4 overall.

Some of these scouts and personnel people live off of high school rankings regardless of college performance.
The moment that Tate was intimidated by that Miami secondary, there's no way that kid should have been a top 10 draft choice. Innis the south florida version of Julian Fleming.
 
View attachment 371065

A perfect example of why you can't always use what scouts & GM's say as a final barometer.

The lack of production + the tape over the 3 year timespan doesn't say anything close to a 1st rounder.

But because Oh ST WR's have had so much success in the league, some front office dork will think that it means that all their WR's are like that.

It's the classic Correlation - Causation fallacy.

FIFY

1788215435277.png
 
Anybody who has watched an Arthur Smith coordinated offense knows he has a particular distain to slot WRs and really any secondary WRs.

Jeremiah Smith, their TEs and the RBs in that order will get the overwhelming majority of passes.

Day made a lazy hire and he is going to find out what NFL fans have known for a long time.
 
View attachment 371065

A perfect example of why you can't always use what scouts & GM's say as a final barometer.

The lack of production + the tape over the 3 year timespan doesn't say anything close to a 1st rounder.

But because Oh ST WR's have had so much success in the league, some front office dork will think that it means that all their WR's are like that.

It's the classic Correlation - Causation fallacy.
Plus lack of physical traits. He plays like a 4.6/4.7 guy.

You may ask, well if he’s so crummy, why is he gonna start for arguably a top 3 team? Maybe their WRs corps is not as good as the they think?
 
Back
Top