Search results

I'd rather have Parrish... But if you are talking nothing standing out...I mean he does move pretty well for 220. 220 is something Parrish doesn't have and never will so it depends what they are looking for. I'd take Parrish in this class in a heartbeat though.

Yup I like those guys too...Lingard IMO came in with a little more risk than the average 5* can't miss type...Even pre-injury and now you add the injury. His upside is huge with the athleticism, but at times I thought he lacked some wiggle and RB instincts (obv he'll run throw and by you)...

Can't argue with everything except the final statement...Don't understand the "not a pure RB" argument on here. He imo is the best RB on the roster, both now and upside (at least pre-chaney)...Kid carries 215-220 easy, has excellent vision...And can run inside or out. I like the others we have...

I think Dallas will show out this year and get his. But yes point is well taken.

Yes I've seen Kevin Smith plenty, didn't need the scouting report...Do agree somewhat on the negatives And yes I understand the workloads for both prospects...I'm talking about moving forward AND I'm not sure Chaney is a pure workhorse either. But ya I would like those 2 as our 2020 backfield...

Ya but I think Holmes could more of a multi-purpose "weapon" too...He' prob not an every down back...He'd be **** in the slot with that footwork.

Don’t like the comparison at all but i don’t mind Parrish in this class. I’d take him as a change of pace guy