Search results

  1. S

    John Dixon ?

    I like this kid because he doesn't tweet a lot.
  2. S

    John Dixon ?

    So you're saying Dixon is a courtesy visit?
  3. S

    John Dixon ?

    Nice breakdown, and I'd say with Diaz scheme preferences, there is some flexibility at the striker/S/LB spots...I personally would go more like this 16 DL (you are prob redshirting 1-2, i wouldn't even argue with a 17th) 10 LB/STrikers (2-3 pure mikes, or maybe one of those mikes has ability to...
  4. S

    John Dixon ?

    What's up with the knee? Refresh my memory, was it recent or last season? Did he play this season?
  5. S

    John Dixon ?

    Who cares? Stack chips and we still won't be anywhere near 85 anyway. Let's say both commit (I personally think we will get 0-1), but let's just say both, and let's say for your argument Frierson stays at CB, which imo is iffy, but let's say it happens...It's 9. And again that's at the most...
  6. S

    John Dixon ?

    No prob with that...unless Frierson makes the move at some point back to safety...and even then just stack chips, especially if Smith ends up more towards the striker position.
  7. S

    John Dixon ?

    This kid is a good player, legit cover man with possible return skills. IMO, they should take him if he wants in, and I think they will. Dent and Elam are probably pipe dreams. Then Emerson as the Stevenson backup plan, or just take Emerson too.
Back
Top