Search results

Break down the logic of the slow offensive drives again for us after what you watched tonight. I'd be interested to hear it.

BUMPPPPPPPPPP

Bump

That’s fine. You can like everything about his offense and it can or can’t do. I’ve argued enough about what I don’t like about him. My only point is your “analytic” point is wrong. Nobody at Footballs Outsiders would argue that you should “slow down” if your defense plays fast. The...

This is just wrong. No analytic approach would agree with anything you just wrote.

Right. Dude that follows college football for a living has no idea about our OC hire because our OC hire has never done anything as an OC to leave a lasting impression. So instead he's saying, "But if he's going to do what this other guy does, then it's good."

Yet another person saying as long as the coach doesn't do what he naturally wants to do, and instead runs something else, it's a great hire. That's the scary part about the hire. "As long Enos doesn't be Enos, it's good."

This is just dishonest. We have SO many threads and posts on this board with the fans discussing the offense they wanted. Anybody saying, "You guys just can't be happy," are ignoring allllllllllllllllllll of those posts.

So Diaz just hired a 50 year old OC that will be doing his best impression of the young offensive gurus and what they are running? At that point, just hire the young gurus.

With the talent Alabama had, what scheme do you think they could have run and not have scored a ton of points? They could have run the TO and still scored a ton.

And this is the problem. The rest of college football is spreading you out and using a lot of motion and misdirection to freeze the defense and create spacing. This helps the OL. Meanwhile we just hired an OC that is going to require out OL to lineup and dominate the man in front of you...