Search results

No but I am going to keep repeating this..... I saw the Patriots score 589 points in 2007......Brady got hurt and they scored 410 points the following year with Casell. Entire same offense was back...Welker & Moss playing at Pro Bowl levels, entire offensive line.... 2007 Brady 4806 Yards 50...

So you agree it was dumb point to be brought up about being "lucky to get Goff".

Counterpoint..... Manning had Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne and Edgerrin James for most of his career.... Brady was winning Superbowls with Deion Branch and David Givens as his top WR's and Kevin Faulk as his running back. Seems Relevant.

Lawn Service.....What a zinger you really got me. Whatever.....You got a hard on for Brady. It causes you to say things "Look how lucky he is to get Goff in the superbowl, while ignoring he had to beat a "borderline" HOF QB in first playoff game and then go on the road (because of a fluke play...

Show you statistically how Brady is way better than the guys you claim had equal clutch performances....you then credit coaching for the huge discrepancy. Show you what happens offensively when all factors, including coaching are equal, but Brady is removed....You ignore the massive...

Then you used in incorrectly. I suggest some grammar courses online.

Explain this then.....Since you brought up winning 11 games with Matt Cassell. Patriots scored 589 points in 2007......Brady got hurt and they scored 410 points the following year with Casell. Entire same offense was back...Welker & Moss playing at Pro Bowl levels, entire offensive line...

Let's examine this. Playoff Games Brady 40 (30-10) Manning 27 (14-13) (Needed that 3-0 Denver Superbowl Run to get to .500 when he was terrible) Rodgers 16 (9-7) 4th Qtr Comebacks - Career (Playoffs) Brady 35 (9) Manning 43 (2) Rodgers 14 (1) Game Winning Drives - Career (Playoffs) Brady -...

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

Dig in those heels......Got it.

Luck is BS argument when it happens over 17 seasons......It is conveniently used one way to justify a position, while ignoring all contradictory "unlucky" things that have happened. For example......Articles like this all always somehow just ignore that insane, Kearse freak catch bouncing off...

Yes....Cassell was not good...... 2007 Brady 4806 Yards 50 TD 8 Int 68.9 Comp% 117.2 Rating 88.5 QBR 8.3 Yrds/attempt 21 Sacks 589 Points Scored Next Season, Entire same offense was back...Welker & Moss playing at Pro Bowl levels..... 2008 Cassell 3693 Yards 21 TD 11 Int 63.4 Comp% 89.4...

Just want to point out.....Patriots scored 589 points in 2007......Brady got hurt and they scored 410 points the following year. Yes they won 11 games, but the offensive drop off was pretty significant.