Search results

  1. M

    Why do we offer some lower rated kids while ignoring seemingly better prospects?

    Right, but the point is their classes historically ranked lower. But, their blue chip ratio is where it needs to be with system guys. They routinely end up in the teens because they don't sign a ton of players. That's what he's getting at w/r/t rank.
  2. M

    Why do we offer some lower rated kids while ignoring seemingly better prospects?

    Great effort all around by the Ortiz family orchestrating this.
  3. M

    Why do we offer some lower rated kids while ignoring seemingly better prospects?

    Go back a number of years and the only program consistently in the top five is Alabama. That's their philosophy and bags + solid coaching certainly doesn't hurt. Can't argue with the results, but as the rankings pretty much prove no other school can do that, though UGA under Kirby is rivaling it...
  4. M

    Why do we offer some lower rated kids while ignoring seemingly better prospects?

    In all seriousness, our decline started when we relied solely on ratings and highlights. Just let the staff do their thing. **** Coker
Back
Top