Yes that’s what I was saying. I assumed the poster was saying if he ran those times as a 10th grader then he’s even faster now. I think we’re saying the same thing. That’s why I stated in another post that he wasn’t being critical of the kid.
Haha yea I meant that poster but I don’t think he did it as a critique. I think he just took the most recent track times (which was two years old) and basically implied that if he ran that as a 10th grader he’s more than likely even faster now.
Yea I don’t think the OP needed to add his 10th grade times but I assume they were saying it was decent times for a 10th grader but they are slow in the grander scheme of things. However, he looks faster on film. I like this pick up.