Search results

Yea but like you said in a recent post, regarding if WR don’t have speed or run routes well then we should opt for taller WRs is a great point. I think most people are saying that ignoring WR because they are under 6’3 is a bad idea. However, I don’t believe you are saying that. Yea Renfrow...

You’re right! I think you could have kept it this simple this earlier in your post haha. You’re right. Height is an important attribute like speed and route running. However, tall receivers should also be good route runners and are physical. As far as catching, if you can’t catch you shouldn’t...

Hunter was never their best receiver however he was very important and made key plays. Clemson would not turn him away. Other than that your point is perfect.

Yea LSU and Clemson are different. Those WR have size, are really fast, run good routes, and are quick.