Search results

I read an article on Napier and they was praising him for his attention to detail in building a program. Pretty much saying he was the next Saban in those regards. I would take a chance on him. But I guess all those things are contingent if the BOT gives him the resources to build a quality...

Who would be better for the program in the long run between Freeze and Napier? And who could build the better staff. I know both were good recruiters in the SEC but we probably won't play those games so I'm curious who would have the energy to be good on the trail and evaluate those players as...