Search results

...umm, you just proved my point though. If the 12 team playoff had existed this whole time all those Alabama teams would has less of chance to win the title and all the teams outside of the top 2/4, their chances go from literally 0.0% because they're not in to something greater than 0.0%. So...

One third of the data points in the statistical dataset comes from him though. He's played in 9 championship games over there past decade and a half. So the argument is Nick Saban would not win a championship at Michigan State because Nick Saban did not win a national championship at Michigan...

Do you think Saban could have won a NC at Michigan State if he had stayed?

Except Saban left Michigan State by choice because he was paid more. Harbaugh left Stanford by choice because he was paid more. If Saban stays at Michigan State you don't think he could have won a championship? Harbaugh is 12-1 his final year at Stanford, there's no chance of him winning a...

So what do you do with the data that Mario went 21-6 his first two years at Oregon? Does that not count? Is that not proof that he is capable and maybe there's other "nuance" to the discussion? Nick Saban went 12-11 his first two years at Michigan State. Jim Harbaugh went 9-15 his first two...

I also find it funny that of that list of 16 people like half of them ended up getting fired. It's really only Saban, Urban, Smart, and Dabo that have had prolonged success.

The playoff is 12 teams going forward so all this data and commentary is completely irrelevant.