Search results

Finally some real talk. Thank you. I knew I didn’t see 4.4. 4.65 at 6’5” and 220 is still no joke. But he’s not running by decent safeties.

Well ****. If this is the case, he may solve both our problems. We needed a legit deep threat to keep the safeties honest and we needed a guy who would catch contested throws.

Yeah, a little Lance Leggett going on there. That CB got thrashed with a moment's hesitation even though he was 10' off.

Are you sure? I couldn’t find anything and he definitely didn’t look that fast in his game highlights.

Agree. Welcome to the U!

100% agree as of right now. Could look very different in 3 months from now, especially after a few games. So much can change with a real staff. Hopefully it does.

Look at that film. There is no way in **** he ran a 4.6 in HS. He's a Langham or Cager type if we're lucky. His comp is putrid, so who knows. Not saying it's a bad take given our need. At least in his highlights he has good hands, which we sorely lack. And Gattis knows his WRs. But we're not...

I have no problem taking him. But I would rather run multiple TEs and treat them like flankers instead of a guy with average talent, because they’ve got serious talent. That said there’s no arguing we need the depth at WR.

Is he fast and can he catch the ball?