Search results

I agree that that's the starting point for your board. Then you adjust for quality depth at each position (don't count blocking dummies like Bar Milo). Then you adjust for the quality and interest level of available talent, which is always dynamic. ... But to achieve a balanced roster, you're...

At the end of the day, this staff is kicking *** on the recruiting trail. We have some big names that need to come on board soon! Davis is wrong. Spots are filling up, chairs are being taken. Scarcity makes for competition.

Don't be like that. Geo and the other CIS staffers are super-fans and awesome communicators of information. None of us agreed we would end with 1 CB, but do you really think they are lying and making a claim that they were told something they weren't? That makes zero sense. Much more likely is...

We can all agree that 1 CB in this class would have been foolish. Now coaches plans are more in line with what our own eyes are telling us. It's also possible back then that they may have thought Richards would be a CB even if he comes in as an athlete. w/r/t Blades, he has a Dean or early...

The Recruiting Board Couch is a 4 star who already decommitted from Tenn and Michigan, correct? I wouldn't call that "lower". His only question mark is his ability to gain good weight, which I don't think is going to be a problem. Other than Elam, who hasn't shown any sustained interest...

Not me, but I did say I'd be surprised if we took more than 6 DBs + Richards as an athlete. We have a lot of other spots needing depth, as well. Gotta add at least 6 on the DL, for example, hopefully 7. I was expecting 2 CBs, 1 nickle and 2 safeties, plus Richards = 6. But it looks like they're...

I think we got the best three available after Elam, who wasn't interested. Not worried at all about Couch's weight. Felder will have us fans complaining he's fighting for a DT spot with Deejay Dallas after a few months of an S&C and nutrition program. I like Davis' game. He played a lot more...