Search results

Sanction for what? All NCAA enforcement power related to NIL has been completely nullified after the SCOTUS ruling. Frivolous enforcement efforts by the NCAA can absolutely be challenged in court and overturned. That NCAA setting doesn't matter if their claims are frivolous. It will be...

Or just re-institute a requirement to sit a year when transferring unless you can satisfy a threshold for extenuating circumstances

You must not have strong rooting interest in Miami then. Or just must have not paid attention to the inherent advantage certain schools created in cahoots with the NCAA before the NCAA lost a ton of enforcement power as a result of the Supreme Court ruling.

Sanction for what? You need to understand how regulatory framework functions in America if you're going to not care what happens in a courtroom after the SCOTUS ruling. You do know that NCAA action can be appealed to a court of law, right?

My assumption: not in a manner that can be proven in court

That makes sense if Miami was actually doing something illegal. When big business has a regulatory opening, you attack it and leverage it to the maximum extent possible within the confines of the law. If regulating bodies want to seek to further regulate AFTER due to externalities, then that...