Search results

Why are you asking him? You declared he wasn't at the scrimmage

Then get off the board and wait til gameday because you know you're not getting that from a closed scrimmage lol

What was the velocity? What was the Pro Football Focus grade for each throw and play? What was the average depth of target and window of separation by each WR? What was the down and distance and analytical assessment of success in comparison to the result? Sure I'd love to know every little...

Having access to practices does not equal having access to the inner workings of the coaching staff, Athletic Department and BOT. Posters whose usernames start with a D tend to have more access to practice than the media does. That much is for sure.

That may be all we have to go by, but that's not all the coaches have to go by. So, the declarative assumptions you're making as to the rank of each QB in every facet of their game seems very premature and likely misinformed. BTW, in case it's not abundantly clear, there are a few who have...

I don't know that he's inherently anti-Tate. He just seems to put waaaayyyy too much stock into the reports from media personnel that are relegated to watching throwing warmups during the first period of practice after stretching

What do you mean? He informed us that Bandy was our best DB but was undersized. How could he have known that info if not coming directly from his NFL plugs that are at all of our practices?

You are doing your best to ensure the last sentence of your post is true

Sounds like a great thing. THat's what OSU does to great success.

QBs throw collectively for 71% and just because D Money mentions Tate may have performed the best by a slight margin we got haters coming out crying. This board is ridiculous. 71% is outstanding news. Close your agendas for a second and enjoy it.