Search results

THIS. It is only one of two hesitations I have for going with Lane. He's obviously got Ole **** disciplined enough and FAU never seemed to not be disciplined, but he doesn't ooze that tough, disciplined thing like Mario and Schiano. Stoops has a little of that disciplinarian edge.

This man is speaking the truth.

I would totally be down for Mark Stoops. The ONLY thing you could possibly say is that he hasn't won on a grand scale, but he's at Kentucky!! He's absolutely proven himself and I would be delighted if he was the one who accepted the job. Regarding recruiting, I have no idea what his rep is on...

Exactamundo!

I wonder if he could be a Gene Stallings type. Not overly successful in the past, but enough that he got the nod at BAMA and went on to win a Natty and have a few really successful years there. Hope springs eternal.

That's one play, but we took a HUGE step forward once he took over the D.

Yeah, if Butch had made that move a season or two earlier, he would've built the team back even more quickly. Miller was just too read and react and Butch needed aggression out of his D.

I think the allure would be that he actually could win a natty here within 5 years if things went the right way and he will NEVER win a natty or even sniff a playoff while he's at Rutgers. He had a fast rise years ago, and then plummeted and even had TN students protest him taking the job in...

We've had coaches who the players liked and it always disintegrated the team. As long as he gets results, I'm OK with the players grumbling about him.

Don't you think that could have been because those were pros and he was treating like college kids? I've never heard kids complain about him. He was terrible for the pro game, but is good for the college game.