Search results

  1. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    I kinda get that there aren't a lot of teams that can do that and a player knows the risk in signing at a place like that. Also, weren't scholarships always known as 1 year renewals anyway, I can see if they wanted to address that too. However, this is a clusterfack and most schools are being...
  2. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    We've been saying the next class is loaded for at least a decade and we continue to whiff on signing day. At some point, we need to worry about now.
  3. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    This is what I don't understand, seriously. If you're allowed to have 85 scholarships, why do they care how many you sign, if you have room?
  4. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    I agree, just another reason they are going to have to change the rules.
  5. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    Juniors have been leaving for years and from every program. We've been under the limit for a decade
  6. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    How can you oversign if you have to stay at 85? I know you can go over 25 but if you have under 85, it's not oversigning. I guess that's where I get confused
  7. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    I think we're good with who we have, plus the new guys and we just got the kid from Cali. Just like the scheme will help the OL, I think we'll see the receivers do a lot better. But just looking at each position aside from scheme, I think we need much better talent and depth at OL. Jmo
  8. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    I understand, I definitely hope they get the best 2 OL available with what's left. All these other positions are great but we've been severely underperforming there since at least 2013
  9. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    I've heard that but they are the only team I've heard doing that and honestly, if the kids know that and still choose to go, that's on them. They weren't hiding it and they're one of the only ones in the country that could pull it off. They still had to operate within the same 85 as anyone else
  10. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    I get what you're saying but you have to fill the roster and you to have experience and leadership, it can't all be eighteen year olds either. They are definitely going to have to amend that.
  11. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    That's ridiculous. What's the point of allowing 85 if you can't have 85. I get the 25 per year but that should only be high school. With the grad transfers and now the portal, there will be roster subtractions and additions from all levels of classes/eligibility.
  12. duke4heisman

    Ivins: “numbers situation”

    I thought transfers didn't count against IC?
Back
Top