Search results

K

We already grabbed 2 DT. We also have 2 DT returning from last years portal "haul". That brings our current total to 11 DT. That is already an extremely high number. Ideally we wouldn't keep taking mediocre to ok players at the position but the answer isn't to keep adding more of the same...

Anyone saying that has a "loser mentality" apparently. Obviously everything is fine and no reason to voice opinions or concerns stating otherwise.

I've been on the WR train longer than anybody here. Would be amazing.

I'm in the same boat with WR. Ideally someone from these last 3 classes steps up and we finally have a WR1(Trader being my vote) but that is a lot to ask with a 1-year rental at QB. I think that position can add us wins.

You could have just said I don't want to answer your question. I offered to engage in a discussion knowing that you are staunch defender and your ties to the prgram. I asked philosophical questions about roster construction while offering 0 critique in the process. Although I am not compelled...

Lol, this is a message board for offering opinions and asking questions. If I were on staff Id have answers. Thanks for the reminder though.

I think we could all argue what our biggest need is. I do not see a clear cut answer. The bigger issue is why are we limited on spots? Are we against pushing kids out? Are we allowing kids to stay that won't ever contribute? Do you think those are systematic mistakes?

😐

If after 3 years of evidence you think we have a shot here, the Baker Act was created for you.

If Howard is still QB1 they can already kiss that dream goodbye.