Search results

Quite the conundrum CIS has created.

Maybe but naming NFL Quarterbacks as justification that 3* QB are the new wave is weak. Roughly 80-110 each year and the hit rate isn't exactly high. Same as saying every year great QBs will be in the portal when we saw the 2023 options were bad at best.

Top 10 portal QBs 2023.

Western Kentucky, is where I bow out and agree to disagree.

Smh if we landed the higher rated QBs we pursued the previous years this isn't even a talking point. Gross

The part you keep skipping over is none of those teams are bringing in Emory and Judds to the QB room. They are still recrruiting blue chip QBs. Because that is how you build a team through COMPETITION. If this is those players transfer is the argument why not just forego signing a QB from HS...

Exactly, the bring in a transfer part is fine. It's the take developmental projects that don't provide any competition part that is gross.

T All 5 of those teams signed blue chip QBs.

I'll join @01Canes in being skeptical of trying to reinvent the wheel. Even if this offseason was viewed as a success rather than luck. The potential good seems shortsighted unless we are going all out for a championship this year. The rest of the portal additions look more like trying to...

Do you think recruiting over the position each year is the right philosophy? Example trying to find someone from 24' class better than Bain at DE.

Pivot to 3* Wilbur Morgan from butt**** Kentucky who they had on the same level as Nickel. edit: Imma take a lap I got 9 months.

No other serious school is operating that way.

😔 I was hoping this would have been a lesson learned.

He has already said that previously.

Then why bring in 25-30 high school players limiting portal openings?

3 coaching changes and a player that switched before attending the school. This is a loaded example.

We hire new head coaches every 3 or 4 years as well. Stability has not existed at Miami.