Search results

Id say the mopes coming out the woodwork moaning all day long on here in EVERY thread IS their version of celebrating. Yet y'all allow that without issue. Lol how bout you show me where I'm being a 'slurper' and crossing the line? Yall provide me with any rules I'm breaking if and when that...

The problem is the people that look at the bigger picture and walk away ****ting on this program. How do you look at the bigger picture and walk away *****ing after witnessing the last 20 years lol.

... The information may change. The decision likely hasnt changed in weeks

So then why do you think I'd be ****ting on you? lol.

assaulted lol.

Guess we'll see. Hope we get them. I'm assuming I'm a slurper in your eyes?

So are we acting like those people haven't been plaguing the recruiting board the last month? lol. All yall are just taking it so personal when I say I'm going to ******* **** on the mopes if we land top targets... wonder why...

And if their response isn't "I'm gladly eating crow on this one, Go Canes!" they're just showing themselves as being little ******* imo. Those type of people on here would rather us be bad and *****, then be good and celebrate. And there absolutely are people like that. So yeah, Seems pretty...

So being positive about our program is the bad thing, while the negative whiners are the ones that need protection cause they're "just being objective" lol. I'm just wondering is it being objective to whine about a whiff that hasn't even whiffed yet? How is that anything but being a mope? What...

Sadly that didn't clear anything up lol, you're going to have to say exactly which "fight" with him you're talking about in the conference thread for me to know which I'm supposedly losing.

What fight would that be? lol

Protect the mopes at all costs, got it. lol. ... Man I hope we get all these guys. I wonder if others hope that too. I remember people used to go with "I'll happily eat crow if I'm wrong". Guess they won't be happy to do it anymore...weird.

But if we land them we weren't being bodied, yet you were being negative lol. That's the ******* point.

If you don't want to see us dancing, don't let us get in the endzone.... or in this case people should expect to get **** on if they're wrong after they comment extremely negatively regarding how we are recruiting.

Need ahfua, at a reasonable cost, sure. I think our NIL for Ahfua likely is exactly what we need it to be. Otherschools want to overpay to land an iOL guy, oh well. I want him. I think we can still land him. I don't think it should be done by trying to outspend Texas A&M for him. If that's how...

I'm going to be 100% honest, I don't really care much about iOL recruiting. Anyone complaining we won't beat offers for an iOL, are not thinking clearly. That would be a dumb allocation of resources which everyone is already whining that we have so little of.

Depends how you look at it. If we AVERAGE 10th in spending, that doesn't have to mean that year we are 10th in spending. For instance lets say our budget last year put us at exactly 10th in spending, and this year we spend more. However 3 schools that spent less in 23, are outspending us in...

Stone - 6th overall Simmons - 8th overall Breland - 34th overall Franklin - 45th overall So it's more like NOT missing out on Cormani (because all of the above still haven't picked a school yet) but still complaining about missing them. Can we at least miss on them before everyone acts like we did?

That really wasn't my point though... Insert whatever team in there that randomly will majorly outspend, and most years be less than us. I'm just saying I'd rather be like at a consistently increasing level. Pretty much everyone with knowledge of our NIL situation is saying we INCREASED spending...

Uh I said "top" as in not top 5 because that's how OTHERS were referring to it. Yesterday I was defending our NIL lol...Thinking we're going to outspend Texas and A&M, or any of like 10 teams if they go all in one year, yeah that should NOT be the expectation. I much rather us stay consistently...