Search results

The comment above this one I literally talk about why its not important to get a traditional SS type player. I do know the difference, I'm just not agreeing that it is neccessary when we already have Carter, Smith, Finley, Knowles, on the roster. I agree we have better options at CB than Couch...

Bruh I understand the 425 defense and how to separate FS and SS. Also there has been absolutely no actual indication from Diaz that our primary defense will be switched to a 425. Will we run 425? no ****, its just a nickel defense. But will we run 425 when the offense is in 2 wide? Doubtful...

but Smith isn't top 5 which I literally showed. He's barely a top 10 db for us. Thats just the facts. Sure we may not hit on all our targets,, but thats when we should shoot for a commitment from Smith. Not before the guys ahead of him have even announced where they want to go. Thats called...

Okay you guys keep saying his versatility is a big positive for him...how? How is adding another LB/S hybrid a positive for us at this point in time? I just don't get that. We are recruiting 4 ******* LBs this yr! we don't need a guy that can play LB. We need a guy that will exclusively be a...

Okay, so you're calling me a clown, but you ******* agree with what I'm saying? Lol. I haven't said Smith wasn't top 4 safeties for us. I'm merely stating that Stevenson, Richards, Battle, and Gant were ALL better prospects (with Richards being a take as an athlete). And You say we want 3 of...

I think you guys are completely missing my point lol.

So once again we have the argument of we should get someone because the guys that are higher priorities are more difficult to land. honestly thats complete bs to me. If we get Stevenson, Battle, and Richards thats 3 safeties, is it not? Then you say McIntosh will play LB if anything, but you...

I agree with 5 DBs + Richards and McIntosh. So say we take Smiths commitment right now. Then Stevenson, Steele, Davis, Battle, Sanguinetti, Gant, Couch, Dixon, etc all want in this class. Who are you leaving out to take Smith, or are you just planning on taking his commitment knowing full...

I absolutely do not see the increased value in a guy that is a hybrid S/LB when we are already bringing in 4 ******* Lbs in this class. sorry but I want a ******* pure S. I'm not concerned AT ALL what Smith can provide as a LB. I'm concerned with what he provides as a Safety prospect. And in...

So you're idea is to not even try to recruit those guys and to just go with the lesser talent 8 months ahead of ESD and 10 months ahead of NSD? Like come on, we don't even have one ******* DB commit yet. I really don't get why everyone is in such a rush to add like the 10th (or later) best DB...

No it didn't. Samuel should have been a for sure take the entire time. Then he was independently evaluated to be a take same way Nigel Bethel was. but even if this example was accurate, I would still say we don't need to ******* commit to Smith 8 months ahead of time. When it gets closer to...

Did I say he can't be a good safety? No. I said "He isn't a pure safety". Idk if you watched his highlight tape, but he's basically a ******* LB. Sorry but hybrid S/LBs are not high priorities in my eyes. Out of those players I listed WHO EXACTLY is he a take over? I'll list them again for you...

The problem with this is Asante Jr should have been a take the entire time. Keontra Smith isn't even a pure S. He's a hybrid S/LB. And we're already taking 4 LBs this class. Plus we have Frierson and Blades who potentially could move to Safety in the future. The top safeties imo are Battle...

Brendan Gant is a take at Safety over Smith. Imo Smith is the kinda guy we take as a commit after we figure out how the rest of the DB board plays out.

If I had to choose 6 guys, they'd be: Tyrique Stevenson, Mark Richards (Athlete), Chris Steele, Jordan Battle, Jaden Davis, and Kaiir Elam.

Thought you literally said recently that Stevenson was a Safety? Now you're saying CB? Honestly Idgaf which he plays, just makes sure he's a Cane.