Search results

Ok all good we agree. For some reason, our backs weren’t used in the game plan very well. I think Lashlee had a poor plan or poor call in game. It sucks.

I think you were talking about WR screens. I was talking about RB screens or just quick hitters to the backs. Kind of like Clemson did with Etienne. The WR screens were dead on arrival because their corners were pressing.

That’s your opinion. Never said it was easy. Playing Clemson is hard. We went into the half with momentum and 20 minutes to adjust. We went 3 and out to start the 2nd half then threw a bad pick on 1/10 from the 28 after our defense got the ball back. I’m not sure what we are debating...

We weren’t down 21-0. It was 14-3 and then 21-3. The adjustments could have come at 21-10 where we started the third quarter. Lashlee had a bad game. It happens.

Wasn’t a good night from Lashlee. The bright side of that is that this was only game 4 in this offense, Venables is the best DC in the business, and we had a personnel mismatch with our WR’s on their CB’s. Hopefully, they evolve from this and improve the flexibility within the scheme. We...

We tried some WR screens but those were getting blown up because the corners were playing so tight. I didn’t feel like we ever got into an offensive set where the ball was getting out quickly consistently.

It was definitely disappointing that we couldn’t do anything to penalize them for attacking the LOS as aggressively as they were. Some quick hitters to the backs or running a TE across the middle 10 or so yards from the line would seem to have given us a shot. Seemed like we just stuck to the...