Search results

I would too but it’s looking like the decision was made to take the Palmetto group as a whole. We patched it up with Collins and Collier is now a take. Think that speaks volumes. I’m hoping Daniels still gets a spot.

Sure. We can debate the names all day. I said it’s going to be fluid. However, current scholarship players must be moved out in order to get anywhere near 25 in this class. I think Few, for example, is a good grad transfer candidate. He would have 2 years to play at a G5. Price, I believe...

I’m going to explain this. You can 85 total and 25 in 1 year. However, you have to be at 60 in order to take a full 25. If you are at 62, then you can bring in 23. You can’t bring in 25 if that puts you at 89. So, does somebody grad transferring get you a new 25 IC? No. But it gets you...

Ok bud. Burns will be on the team in 21. You’re right!

I think the main takeaway is that, if we go into to 21 with just the 3, Brashard could serve as an “emergency” RB if somebody got hurt and it was needed. I’d prefer to take Amari as the 4th but I think everybody knows spots are really tight. Tough decisions.

Very good post. Couldn’t agree more.

Spots are definitely at a real premium. I’d like to see him get in but it’s understandable if it doesn’t work.

What’s not happening?

You are incorrect here. There is a 25 and 85. Burns doesn’t impact the 25 but he does the 85. Our issue for 21 isn’t the 25 IC. It’s creating space under 85. We have 8 scholarship seniors. If Burns doesn’t have an impact, then how are we already at 21 commitments?

I’m not even sure how this is a debate lol.

You are guessing on the round. He is a mid round pick and he will leave as long as that is reasonably certain. I’m not sure how this is debatable?

Starter? Probably not I agree. You do remember Homer and Deejay both left after 3. Are they starters?

If Cam has a good season he is off to the league. RB’s don’t stay any longer than they have to and he will have 3 years worth of film.

I’m not sure what your issue is but you seem to have several bud. I said we need a second RB in this class to get us to 4. That would be Daniels. You’re a really odd dude. Hope you have a great evening but I’m not interested in bantering with you at all.

Either that or he may not get brought back for a 5th year. As a coach, are you bringing back a RB who would be 4th on your depth chart for a fifth year? Not likely especially given the recruiting going on.

I hope he does because I think we need a second RB and he is a good fit. But, it seems like he’s going to have to get in soon if he wants to be at Miami.