Search results

That's a problem with leadership. There's none at the coaching level and none at the player level. Taking a flyer on Tate for the bowl game to see if anything changes is a risk absolutely worth taking because he's shown leadership potential as a starter.

We would be at least 9-3. We had no business losing to Ga Tech, FIU and Duke.

Normally I would agree, but our culture is so bad right now I don't see how it could hurt. Starting a guy who just lost to FIU and Duke isn't great for team morale either.

I can agree with that.

Have you ever been a part of an athletic team in your life? What would you do if the 3rd string guy comes around telling people what to do? Use your head man.

So Jarren was "a ******* loser type" that you didn't want on the team last year, but now you're cool with him because he's starting and not flipping his crib over anymore? This is called negative reinforcement. It's why babies, like Jarren, cry all the time. I cOuLd HaVe pRepAreD mORe foR FIU

Exactly. There is no reason whatsoever that he shouldn't be given a chance to start. These guys can't beat Duke or FIU and we expect them to beat La Tech?

But you want Jarren instead? Just because he doesn't have a hottie to go to NY with doesn't mean he didn't have his bags packed after the bowl last year. These guys have egos and want to play.

I'd rather have DJ Dallas as QB and run the wildcat 100 times per game.

Because we're 6-6 without a quarterback. Because our current QB's can't beat FIU or Duke.

Yeah we just went 6-6, god forbid they try to make a change. Just keep doing what got us to Shreveport in the first place.

Well that's what happens when Enos is the one who makes the decision.