Search results

  1. T

    Coaching v Talent

    We lost to FIU & La Tech because we had a weed head @ QB. Shannon, Golden, and now Diaz, were some of the lowest paid HCs in P5. That's what explains the let downs, and why this program has underachieved relative to its recruiting rankings. This program has been out spent by teams in its own...
  2. T

    Coaching v Talent

    Exactly. Because in CFB, as with most things in life, there's a positive correlation between coaching ability, and resource allocation. I don't think your friend @Rellyrell understands this basic concept. He's disappointed this program couldn't find the next Saban paying him the 41st highest...
  3. T

    Coaching v Talent

    This makes no sense. Nebraska as an example doesn't prove that talent is more important than resources. If anything it proves the importance of evaluations. Nebraska has resources, and were recruiting at a top 20 level. The issue is they've been recruiting the wrong players, which is why they...
  4. T

    Coaching v Talent

    In any market human capital flows towards financial resources. For some reason you guys are trying to argue the opposite can be true in CFB, despite knowing the teams who win the most, also spend the most. UGA, ND, BAMA, OU, OSU, LSU, TAMU, are some of the highest spending teams in CFB. Yes, UT...
  5. T

    Coaching v Talent

    It's annoying because you live in an alternate universe. You're struggling with comprehension. I'm not saying it's the ONLY thing that matters genius. I'm saying it's the MOST IMPORTANT factor in CFB. Look around and survey the landscape, and tell me which program is able to offset lack of...
  6. T

    Coaching v Talent

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but in CFB, the most important determining factor for winning, is resource allocation. Not talent. I suggest you, and others who share your misguided views, learn more about this program's financial situation.
Back
Top