Search results

The problem is there are not just 1 or 2 outliers, there are always a lot. The article could have just said to have a decent chance of winning the national title you have to recruit like Alabama (#1 class every year). And recruiting rankings have only been around 20 years, so again, acting...

Just use Derick Hunter as an example, how is a DL with these testing #s a 4*, top-200 guy? From March: 6'3.5" 276 5.39/40, 5.16ss, 25.3 vert, 41 powerball sparq score 78.54 I mean, that's a joke, especially for a position where physical ability is so important.

Incredibly accurate for what? For 5*? yes. But it's pretty easy to identify the top 30 players in the country. That's probably true out to the top 100-150 Its a lot more difficult to rank between say #250 and #750, even though that has a huge impact on where a team's recruiting ranking will fall

LSU, FSU, and Michigan were National title contenders last year according to that ratio. Exactly why people need to stop taking rankings as gospel. They're important, but they're not dispositive of how a team will perform And why not just cut the list to Alabama, Ohio St, and Clemson alone...