Search results

Now when I see posters who post incorrect information, I'm just going to drop this:

Be careful, there's some poster out there (and I honestly can't remember his name) who gets mad if you use a mob boss example.

Please stop with this dopey nonsense. Do I think "collectives" enforcement would be happening? Recruiting? Tampering? Yes, with many, many programs. But if he was more quiet about things, do I think UM transfers would be part of this "witness roundup"? No. No I do not. This isn't about...

Wrong on so many counts.

Absolutely correct. I love John Ruiz, but the lines between "individual" and "business" have been blurred by a lot of social media activity. There will be questions. He probably wins in the end, but nobody really needs/enjoys the NCAA rectal exam. Before a year ago, nobody knew anything...

He is.

It's not easy. On tampering, it will ALWAYS be hard. Not to mention that most of the back-channeling is NOT tampering. If a kid wants to leave, he wants to leave. If he wants to lock in a landing spot before he announces, that is normal. How do most of us ever change jobs? We usually...

Rule #1 already exists. Rule #2 probably would not survive a court challenge.

I've talked about this before. You are right, there were not many NIL rules. But there have AAAAAALWAYS been booster rules. I tried to tell people that those rules never disappeared. @IndayArtHauz might be right, this could be a big scare tactic. But the NCAA has been successfully scaring...

Tried to tell people that the NCAA was gonna try to bite back... I love John Ruiz, I root for LifeWallet to kick a$$, I just wish he'd take things down a notch or two. No need to offer up a "this is what we are trying to address" example for the NCAA. Move (and kill) in silence.