Search results

Your post is laughable. Completely devoid of truth or accuracy. You started out by trying to calculate scholarships FOR NEXT YEAR, but you keep jumping back and forth between years and rules, thus drawing the wrong conclusions. I have never said that we can "ignore the 85 cap", genius, I very...

You really don't understand the rules.

Quit trying to revive a bullsh!te argument that is just wrong.

After years of making an honest effort, I now refuse to converse further with anyone who counts walk-ons. It's too much. If someone really don't understand why those scholarships do NOT need to be "pulled", that person should refrain from the analysis.

Amen, brother. I don't know why Emmert is always expecting some divine intervention to bail his butt out of another sticky predicament.

You are correct, as it applies to Alabama, generally speaking. But you have to make the rules for all the teams, and we need to stop being afraid of "the rich getting richer". Only 22 can play. Alabama is not just losing "the bottom half of the class", they are losing kids who could start...

Right, but we have a one-year exemption (for 2021-2022) on roster numbers (85). 2021-22 is the year that "D'Eriq King was supposed to be gone". Yes, 2022-2023 is the year of reckoning, because we are supposed to be down to 85 by August 2022. But there is plenty of time for the NCAA to pull...

Wrong. The issue, for this year, is 25. You see it at Miami, and across the country. There WILL be a day of reckoning on the 85, but as per the recent pattern of behavior, the NCAA is powerfully kicking that can down the road.

The two hottest of the hot/dumb takes on this board are from guys who only read Twitter and ignore the details, and who also have no idea how college football recruiting math and roster management work. At the end of the day, everyone will have 22 starters. If Saban wants to have 200...

62. ;)

What I've been saying, and discussing with @Cribby , for quite some time...