Search results

It's the typical nonsense. A poster provides info, and then 3 or 4 wannabes show up to start ****. I've had the same screen name for over 20 years, and I've never been one to initiate things. But I definitely counter-punch. Miami gets on a roll, and right on schedule the most miserable fvcks...

Ooooh, now we have jthomps making a comeback, getting all snippy now that he thinks people have forgotten his last ****** alias. Losers are losers, no matter how many times you change your screen name to obscure your past stupidity.

And the dipshi!te squad gets bigger...

Let's just open a special ****** thread for aleahy and AlixCane/Cryptical Envelopes and Boxing Robes and Joe Cane to go talk about how we have 87 guys on the current roster, but we're going to push 32 guys out and we can sign 30 kids with all the extra ICs that they NCAA is going to give us...

Here comes another crybaby still licking his old wounds.

The recent takes were to highly rated kids. I see the remaining offers to similar recruits on a first come, first serve basis (except for Marshall). This is a great point. All of our remaining offers are to blue-chips and have been outstanding for quite some time. All of our takes were...

Let's revisit this thread in a couple of months. I'll still be here and AlixCane will have changed his log-in name yet again.

Everything is fine, you know I respect you and your info, I think the problem is the nitwits who misinterpret the things you post. You and I have discussed these issues, and I definitely know you understand the rules. Any changes that eventually arise will be for everyone, and will be for the...

What a whiny little crybaby you turned out to be. You don't want to read accurate, if lengthy, information? I don't care. Go away. Instead, you're going to yap about "using context clues from a survey of Miami's takes and standing offers", and then you want to criticize me? Just like aleahy...

Do you even read? I said from the outset that walk-ons don't matter, and I wasn't including them in the math. Then I posted the entire list of 75 recruited scholarship players. But you're still d!cking around with walk-on numbers. And making up some bull**** about "permanent scholarships"...

They're not going to work with teams on an individual basis. They're either going to pass a rule or they won't pass a rule. More importantly, none of this matters. It's August. Who will be taken for 2020 to replace Rousseau? Nobody. And his IC slot was going to be available in 2021 anyhow...

Bull****. I've always said that the NCAA could change the rules, but they have not done so yet. Don't go all "vague nonsense" on me with "potential fluidity from current events". The current state of the rules is that opt-outs are not medical retirements. No scholarship relief. That could...

You believe what you want to believe. "Penalized". A player can leave for any reason, doesn't mean you get a scholarship back.

And for the record, I am fairly certain that all opt-outs will COUNT as scholarships (as well as will GET their scholarships) for this year. They are NOT medical retirements.

Right. So I'm right. The point I was making is that (BESIDES YOU) nobody freaking knew how many walk-ons had scholarships. So the EASY solution is to just ignore them, since they don't matter as ICs (they aren't ICs) and the won't matter as COUNTERS after this year (since they are 1-year...

Scholarship charts and walk-ons don't matter. Roster matters. I provided the roster above, which comes from UM, not your top secret computer. You have always been free to supplement the official UM roster, but you have yet to do so. Any time you want to add or subtract names to the list I...

Oh good lord, two guys pretending to have "inside info" on the roster, who want to talk on DMs, who provide zero proof (and it's not exactly sensitive info). I've listed all the 75 recruited scholarship players. Multiple times. But some guys want to talk about Manny's dirty tool. Whatever...

Please cut the crap with walk-ons. My numbers are not "off". I provided the full list on another thread, I even numbered it so that people wouldn't ask "what about the walk-ons". There are NOT 25 spots without non-walk-on attrition. Nobody gives a **** about 8 walk-ons with 1-year...

See, that's an angle that none of us have really considered before today.

It's not some big secret. I listed 12 names. I think 6 is not hard, but again, the discussion about what "could happen" involves getting any extra counters, which would require MORE attrition. Six players of attrition won't be THAT hard. Never said it would be, just need to find the...