Search results

In all seriousness, what elite teams run what we do with the striker position? I'm honestly asking, what teams have the "striker" position as their base defense? Clemson? Alabama? Ohio State? Georgia? LSU? None of them do. They run a base D with LBs aligned in actual LB positions.

You're absolutely making things up at this point. Literally no one does a two point stance outside of amateur hour. Can't believe someone actually said this unless they're living in the 50's. This has to be a joke.

What in the f does it mean playing without Zion playing without his hand in the dirt? I hate to say this, but that’s a banned level comment for not knowing football comment.

The problem is the striker position isn’t aligning themselves in a traditional 3rd LB position no matter the offensive alignment. I should have made that more clear and apologies. If the staff wants to use an undersized LB then that’s fine, but I have a major issue with the staff aligning the...

Agree. And part of team identity is winning and leaders showing up then. It’s just tough...even last year I knew JJ was the leader on D side of the ball and on O it felt like we didn’t have a leader, but I knew the RB room was sort of the leaders whose personalities. Just feels like so far this...

No, just simply play nickel & dime in those situations, and base in others. You know, how every elite team in the country plays defense.

Bethune Cook skews those stats. But keep in mind I'm not saying they've been bad, but the regression has been there for what was expected.

We’re coming off of having a week off and to say the fan base is frustrated would be an understatement. With that said I’ve put together a quick hit list of things I would like to see (not listing everything) for this team. This is an eye towards next year without sacrificing winning this year...