Search results

Vag Tech isn't losing games because of their offense. Their offense is excellent. Hooker throwing more won't make their defense better.

Any chance I can get you to stop calling him Fu on here. It's giving me douche chills that are crippling me and making me miss all the good points you're making.

I'm done moping on the D. I have accepted that it pretty much sucks this year. We have the firepower on O to go to war and beat all the remaining teams.

They're an excellent offense overall. They'll be a big problem for us. If they don't have Herbert that'll be a big help for us because he's been incredible this year. But Hooker will make plenty of plays. They're not a 1970s Oakland Raiders deep passing team, but not many teams are these days.

Their D is total trash.

I've watched pretty much every game he's quarterbacked. I don't care to look at empty stats. He throws the ball well and runs the ball well. He's a very good QB. He kicked our *** in his first game ever last year. Do you think he'll suddenly stink against a worse UM defense with an additional...

Quick lesson: Football coaches will always run the ball when they can run the ball. VT's been running the ball so well that they don't have to pass it 35 times per game. Hooker can throw the ball. Watch the games, not the stats.

Where is this narrative coming from that Hooker can't throw the ball consistently?

He played poorly against Wake. King's had a couple off games this year. Trevor Lawrence had a bad game or two. Everyone does. You put way too much spin on stats. I've seen every VT game this year, and Hooker's a very good QB. He was good last year too. They run more than they throw, but that's...

Yes.

You're setting yourself up for disappointment if you think the Vag Tech offense is anything like GT with Paul Johnson. Hooker doesn't have a ton of yards passing because he missed a few games. The dude's a good passer, as he showed us last year. He's better now.

This is where just looking at stats gets you in trouble. Malik Willis is a super dynamic runner and a pretty good passer. He's a much more sudden runner than King. It takes Willis no time to get from 0 to 60. King's a better passer, and I'll take him as a leader over anyone. But Willis is...

I see it the same way. If we win, I'd expect it to be on King's shoulders. These guys underestimate just how dramatic the edge is to Fuente over Baker. He should make mincemeat of our D if both teams play like they've played this year.

I didn't cherrypick ****. I gave you the actual score in the middle of the 3rd quarter, which supports that the UL game wasn't a blowout. I did that in response to your disingenuous choice of margins without acknowledging that the game was 27-20 in the middle of the 3rd quarter. That's not a...

Keep cherrypicking numbers out of context because that's what you do, but leave out the parts where they closed that gap at times. The game was 27-20 midway through the 3rd quarter. If you want to sit here and claim the UL game was a blowout, that's your thing, and no one will be surprised...

We didn't blow Louisville out. We pulled away a little in the 4th quarter, but that game was at issue going into the 4th, and they were moving the ball at will. By the way, UL is something like 2-5 right now.

Shootouts for the rest of the season. Get ready for them. This D is a toilet, and Vag Tech is a very good offense and exactly the type of offense that gives us the most trouble. Tons of misdirection to take advantage of our lack of eye discipline and lack of discipline in general. Hooker's a...

Facts are now "preposterous?"