Search results

I’m not saying it’s horrible, I just wouldn’t throw around the word ELITE to describe it. Wouldn’t use that word at all, actually.

You said it 3 times, but many may miss it. Athletic performance for nearly all sports involves HIPS. Worrying about bi’s/tri’s abs is silly. You’re so right and I wasn’t knocking Williams, I was just showing an athlete 100lbs less than him pulling within 30 lbs. He’s not alone in T&F.

No idea, and NOBODY pushed Stanford around. In fact, they had one of the better O-lines for years. I read an article on him…he pays ZERO attention to max lifts. ZERO. His entire program is position specific and unique to each athlete.

Those same 110’s scared the **** out of me not knowing his program, I also hesitated to comment — @apfenny3 also commented on them at the time. It’s old school, not scientific and universally seen as useless. CIS posters love to talk about abs and bi’s/tri’s on this site. I look for traps.

When I look at Iowa or Wisconsin or Stanford or Oregon and a few others, they stack up against either of those schools on size, to me. And, AL does not stick out in the SEC. Not to me they don’t.

EXACTLY!!!

This is silly. It’s a canard. It‘s the anthem of the weak. It’s an excuse. Clemson or Alabama’s supposed “size” advantage has nothing to do with why Miami‘s OL can’t get a push and why Miami seems to give up a 10 yard play on every down (hyperbole). And that’s to ACC schools not named Clemson...

Not knocking any of you strength coaches. But, can we agree “that” you do something and “how” you do something are different things? If not, every certified S&C coach would get the same results. We know that’s not true; we know that different coaches get differing results. - an article on...