Search results

And Boosters will resist any change they perceive to reduce attempts to rule the sport.

The NCAA is done, more or less. Too much time resisting change than being proactive. Nearly every change to CFB was due to courtroom losses, from TV contracts in the 1980s to last years SCOTUS ruling in NIL. You’re right, CFB will eventually need real structure to NIL, player movement...

A dollar’s worth of input my friend.

NFL players and coaches have contracts. Player movement is restricted to trades, waivers, or being released. Coaches do leave, but this is usually when an assistant is offered a promotion by another team, with permission of his current team. College athletes do not have contracts. Classifying...

Agreed. The whole ‘entitlement culture’ critique is nonsense. People change jobs for a better situation all the time. Why is a student athlete subject to a different standard? Besides, how many players transfer to another school after their freshman year?

True, but I do not think all conferences have one-year renewable scholarships. Some enacted a multi-year scholarship, the length of eligibility.

If you want fewer transfers have fewer scholarships. Reduce the total of 85 to 75, or even 70. This would disperse talent throughout CFB, from P5 to G5, and down to the FCS level. NIL needs regulations at the national level, either from Congress or preferably from the schools themselves. Both...

I support players being able to transfer to another school. 100%. Coaches can leave without issue, buyout notwithstanding. Coaches can ‘encourage’ players to leave the program, freeing up a scholarship for a new player. There is no legitimate reason players should not be able to transfer to...