Search results

I swore they achieved that in the past, albeit for like a split second. I like this part btw lol "but what does it mean for the future of energy? In all likelihood, very little."

I'll see your fancy fusion and raise you a few ounces of oil and a Romeo...

Ah yes. I thought you meant there was another 'option' than the present one, which is as destructive/anti-green as can be.

Pie in the sky IMO. But what is the parallel 'storage' option - because that's really half the equation? I'm not familiar.

To that end it will likely be never then... unfortunately. We're shutting down carbon-based energy to appease global elites and their simps... only to pimp solar/wind which laughably accounts for a whopping 1.5% of global energy use. As a species - we've literally become to ignorant to survive...

If true the green mafia will move swiftly to shut down it down...