Search results

So you're not a Rosier defender? Buddy, we can all see what you've posted before.

You're contradicting yourself for arguments sake. If you want to run around in circles help yourself. You're trying to turn my arguments for Jarren into attacks on Malik. That's really just you being defensive & trying to distract from the ridiculous comment I called you out on. Can't say I...

I don't wanna embarrass you. You're a Cane after all. That's not close to what I said. I'll restate it: regardless of whether the team is good enough to win a national championship, you play your best players - as in the ones that give you the best chance to win

This thread is a good example of how bullshìt spreads by repetition, what with the two dimwits jerking eachother off after every senseless post :zczkqmritjdsoaq.jpg:

Jesus. You cannot be this dense. Whether or not they can lead you to a national championship, you play the best players. The point being discussed pertains to who our best QB is.

Irrelevant. You argued a concept - that you back Malik because the team needs other pieces. That has nothing to do with who the better option is. You can replace Ferrari with anything that would signify improvement & my point remains the same: you implied that you back Malik as the starter...

Thanks, captain obvious. If you reread your posts, you'll see yourself justifying backing Malik as the starter because you don't believe changing one component will "right the ship". That's like turning down a new Ferrari because you don't think you have a nice enough garage. FOH

Whether or not he eventually leads us to a NC is beside the point. If we do need more pieces to get to that level, why wouldn't you want to improve the most important position on the field ASAP? Being a better QB than Rosier is all the justification I'll need when Jarren takes over.