Search results

Sue me

Have I mentioned I am not a lawyer?

Not that there is anything wrong with it

my claiming not to be a lawyer was not used as any grounds to prove anything. I have an opinion, that's all. And by the same token being a lawyer does not make one's opinion right either. It was **** lawyers who crafted the thing and you have other lawyers disputing its language. So not even...

like I said earlier, I am not a lawyer. But even if the word was "impractical" instead of "impossible" you would still have a team of lawyers on retainer willing to argue what it means if it benefits their client.

of course, words have meaning. But the meanings conveyed by those words can take on different connotations. Which goes back to as one famous political scoundrel once said under deposition "it depends on what the meaning of "is" is." So blow it through your pie hole. im·pos·si·ble...

"impractical" is a synonym of "impossible". Again, the words in the contract are fine to a sensible person with even moderate English language skills. For a lawyer being handsomely paid to quibble about words it is a whole together different situation.

not a lawyer, but it seems to me that if a hurricane does involve "catastrophe" or "disaster" which is language in the contract, why do you have to specify every single possible event that could lead to that in a contract? The language seems to give examples but is not meant as some exhaustive...