Search results

Those spread teams not winning nattys is not a good argument. Realistically there are only two teams that are winning nattys. One of them is full fledged spread. Look at all the teams that's gotten to the national title. Oregon, Ohio St, Auburn with Nick Marshall at QB (converted CB), Auburn...

Do u think it's a coincidence that 90% of the top 25 offenses were spread concepts heavy? There are teams who run the pro-style offenses, they're just not as effective. Let UCF, Houston, Utah run a pro-style offense and i bet they don't rank in the top 15 offenses nationally.

Exactly. If our offense is even competent Enos will be overhyped bc of how abysmal we looked last year. I hope you're right about 75% though.

Those are both teams that would put up numbers running any offense bc of how much talent they have. Meanwhile u have teams like UCF, Houston, Utah St. averaging 500+ yds a game and never going under center. I'd say around 90% the top 25 offenses last year rarely, if ever, got under the center...

How many top 25 offenses from past year got under center as much as we have seen from Enos thus far? Just something to think about.