Search results

He didn’t just go with “good”... he doubled down with “very”. Patke is neither a very good nor good recruiter and he brings nothing special to coaching and development.

Patke is a glaring opportunity for replacement.

This is why I see truth in both sides. I agree with him that we haven’t given kids enough reasons on the field to choose us. That’s our biggest problem. Teams with less, win more. I agree with you that the recruiting at CB, and in my opinion, at LB, hasn’t gone the way it should and I think...

Well, he called you a cuck, which was unnecessary, so you responded. I think there’s truth in what both of you are saying. My upvotes aren’t on the insult parts but on the substance of each argument.

☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝ @Empirical Cane I’ve got your popcorn ready. Personally, I’ve got to upvote both of the combatants for each making good points.

Yeah, I was very happy with our class given our season. Hard to complain about top 15 or so after 6-7. We can complain about 6-7 but our class way out-performed our season.

I don’t know about elite but at least solidify us and everything else you’ve mentioned is how I see it. On defense, we could use help recruiting CB’s & LB’s and we need ST’s coaching as well. LCE’s mentioned it before. At any other major program, Patke is a grad assistant. How is DVD not in...

Patke’s such a glaring, obvious choice for replacement/upgrade, it’s really frustrating.