Search results

This is not true. If not for a bowl ban, North Carolina would've won the Coastal. So you top your post off with misinformation. Nice.

The context that you attempted to provide was false. Basically everything you've said has been smashed to pieces.

Your picture includes no facts and no evidence.

"Strong GT teams" = .545 win percentage "Hapless GT teams" = .568 win percentage "Strong VT teams" = .606 win percentage "Hapless VT teams" = .625 win percentage :LOL: One of my favorite qualities of clueless fanboys is their ego and insecurity. This guy is clearly "in over his head" and...

In Richt's first year, FSU was as good or better than two of Golden's opponents who you claimed were "championship" caliber. Georgia Tech 2016: 9-4 2017: 5-6 2018: 7-6 ------------ Total: 21-16 (.568%) Virginia Tech 2016: 10-4 2017: 9-4 2018: 6-7 ----------- Total: 25-15 (.625%) Wrong again...

FSU was 9-4 in Golden's first year and 10-3 in his last. So wrong about that, too. Georgia Tech 2011: 8-5 2012: 7-7 2013: 7-6 2014: 11-3 2015: 3-9 ------------- Total: 36-30 (.545%) Virginia Tech 2011: 11-3 2012: 7-6 2013: 8-5 2014: 7-6 2015: 7-6 ------------- Total: 40-26 (.606%) So wrong...

The toughest schedule of the last 8 years according to SRS was 2017. https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/miami-fl/ Career SOS rating (at Miami) Richt: 3.61 Golden: 2.71 Another swing and a miss by you.

Richt was "in over his head" but managed to win a higher percentage of his games, win a higher percentage of ACC games and win a higher percentage against teams with winning records. You're making my argument for me. Despite being at the tail end of his career, Richt was still far better than...

I'm going to pull out facts and make your squirm because of how lopsided they are. Facts don't constitute a valid argument to this guy. Gotta love it.

Here's the subjective evidence. Richt's best team was better than Golden's best: 2017 > 2013 In fact, according to SRS (which calculates strength based on point differential and SOS), Richt's two best teams were better than Golden's best: 2016, 2017 > 2013 So Richt had the two best teams of...

Mark Richt..... Had better overall record: Richt: 26-13 (.667%) Golden: 32-25 (561%) Had better conference record: Richt: 16-8 (.667%), 1 division title Golden: 17-18 (.486%), 0 division titles Had better bowl record: Richt: 1-2 (.333%) Golden: 0-2 (.000%) Had same number of wins over...

To be fair, it's only demonstrable to people with a clue.

You are nothing but a cliche machine who said the same shizz about Dan Werner. Probably said the same thing about Mark Richt in 2016.

These are all things that every fan base says about every new coach. Then they coach a game and the tide turns quickly.

I'm not ignorant about how football programs work, though. They are not run by 4-foot-10 college Presidents.

No, you didn't. You whined and then ran away when challenged. FANBOY: Richt was the wooooorst! ME: No, he wasn't. FANBOY: Really?! Prove it!

This is all you can do when challenged. You're so inept that it's comical.

Yes, if I had the burden, I could. But you certainly can't do better. That's clear.

I'm sure it's boring when you continually fail to step up and meet your obligation to prove your claims.

It's not schtick. I just understand basic logic.