Search results

  1. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    Another lie. But this is what you have to do when your narratives get smashed.
  2. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    No. Read above. Miami is slightly above average in the ACC.
  3. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    Sure, if you just make stuff up and erase half the teams. You're a riot.
  4. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    That's in the ACC by the way. And, yes, it's not a problem. The problem is hits and big ones.
  5. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    Another lie. Keep them coming.
  6. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    I just did. One game of 10 walks is....one game with 10 walks. It doesn't change the overall narrative. The Canes don't walk too many guys.
  7. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    After whining about being accurately quoted about one game sample sizes, he dives right into a one game sample size. You can't make this stuff up.
  8. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    If I was as petty as you I'd make an English joke. But I'm not.
  9. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    No, you misunderstood. He said we give up too many walks. I said we're below average in walks. A misunderstanding that only people who are flailing desperately and getting facts wrong (you) would point out.
  10. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    You just didn't understand what I said. That's typical though.
  11. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    No, no. Below average meant that we give up fewer walks than average.
  12. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    No, I stated a fact. 108 walks in 248 innings is fine. Saying that we walk too many guys isn't true. We give up too many extra base hits. We give up too much solid contact. Those would be factual observations. The walks thing is just fanboy silliness.
  13. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    So you said exactly what I quoted and you just doubled down. So why are you whining that you're being taken out of context? Quite the opposite. You get mad when people quote you accurately.
  14. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    You're a clearly a clown who spouts cliches. Nobody needs your "knowledge" on baseball. We're good.
  15. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    We're slightly below average in walks. That's not the problem either. Try again.
  16. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    You're not even a good liar. What's taken out of context? You said that we're 2+ years into the slide because of Pittsburgh. Nobody is taking you out of context, Jagr. You just post so much garbage that you inevitably end up saying a lot of stupid things.
  17. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    Not really. Leading the league in AVG means that they can hit. So they'll probably hit in the next 18 games. Being 9th right now just means that they haven't gotten to play VT, Duke and Wake yet.
  18. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    So I quote you word-for-word and that's unfair. I love it.
  19. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    Of course. I never said otherwise. There you are trying to lie again. I also realize that they are within 2 games of 5 teams ahead of them with 18 games left. So saying that they're 9th right now is pretty meaningless.
  20. Peter Gibbons

    #38 in RPI

    Which is not what you said. Your evidence was one loss at Pittsburgh. I quoted you.
Back
Top