Search results

  1. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    I made the one comparison earlier in the thread. You then said something stupid and I refuted that point. The rest of this is just your mental illness bubbling up to the surface,
  2. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    Look, everybody. Jagr is lying again.
  3. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    You can keep repeating this until you're blue in face (and you will) and it won't make it any more accurate.
  4. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    Nope. Clearly refuted a point that you made. Your condition is worsening.
  5. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    When beaten, just post in all caps and contextual points.
  6. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    Pathetic flailing, now. You certainly aren't a master logician.
  7. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    And I didn't have to. The point stood anyway. Take it out. No context is changed.
  8. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    I didn't look at the last decade. I refuted something stupid that you said.
  9. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    I added as much context as possible in the comparison that I MADE. You then said something stupid that only required one quick response in order to debunk.
  10. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    I already addressed this too.
  11. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    I didn't stop doing anything.
  12. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    That's not what I did.
  13. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    It didn't. You said the comparison wasn't close. I went to the highest possible bar (CWS) and your stellar team only had one more appearance. So clearly there IS a comparison. No need to go further. You were already refuted.
  14. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    You don't care about Super Regional appearances. Stop pretending that you do. All you do is pretend.
  15. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    I didn't have to in order to make the point. I did because I do think they're important. You don't which is why I laugh when you bring them up.
  16. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    By the way, I didn't gloss over it. I just don't have to complete the loop to prove your statement wrong. You said it's not comparison over the last decade when there clearly IS a comparison with Vandy.
  17. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    My comment is that you don't care about Super Regional appearances. If Morris had lost 4 Super Regionals you'd have killed him for it.
  18. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    Wrong. Proving again that you don't read anything that's posted here.
  19. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    Again, the metric being measured is not "health" of a program. You just pulled that straight out of your *** crack.
  20. Peter Gibbons

    Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

    I love it. To evaluate programs that were doormats before their coaches arrived, it's completely arbitrary to start when those coaches arrived. But "last decade"? That's fine.
Back
Top