Search results

Too bad Georgia wasn't able to rest their starters against South Carolina the way Clemson did.

This is comical, but predictable: "Clemson isn't as good as SEC teams!!!" Oh, really? Why did they beat the &^%$ out of Alabama last year? "Uh, because Clemson had more rest!"

Ah, the "more rested for the playoffs" bit. Serious football fans don't bring up silly fan boy arguments like that. Are you suggesting that Alabama was too tired last year to compete?

Actually, no one is questioning the seeding. Everyone knew Clemson would be #2 or #3, which literally makes no difference. Everyone, including you, is talking about who the best teams are. If you're going to play the antiquated "reading comprehension" card, at least read the thread first before...

So what? That sure didn't matter last year.

Since when does conference strength determine who will win a single game? It's obvious you didn't watch last year's playoffs.