Search results

Wrong. It is mind boggling to me that an adult can have such difficulties understanding such an easy to understand point. I feel sorry for whatever McDonalds you work at. I am sure you mess up the orders on a regular basis. Getting offended and crying is what women do. Getting offended and...

WTF is this now? No one is talking about emotional fragility. I am saying. A guy is more likely to explode and lose their temper and start a fight, than a woman. That is not a sign of high estrogen. That is a sign of high testosterone. That is why so many more men commit aggravated assault...

I am not insulting you. I am just making observations. Just because you know a few women, that get violent towards you. That doesn't mean it is a feminine trait. So because a couple cucks liked your comment, that means you are correct? LMFAO. Hilarious. I literally provided evidence that men...

LOL!! We are talking about reacting to violence because it pertains to the topic at hand. You just got so thoroughly beat in this debate, you are trying to grasp at any and all straws to form some sort of victory. Now you have reached the point where you are trying to bring up anecdotes as...

LMFAO Did you actually read the study? This doesn't support your theory at all. 75% of the article is about how women react negatively to violence. Not that they "lose control of their emotions". This type of posting without reading says a lot more about you than it does me. Couple this with...

So you are going to stand by your laughable statement that a 275 lb freak athlete has high estrogen levels? LMFAOO

LOL!!! *********. You know your little theory is 100% incorrect and know are backing down when asked to cite your sources. Who commit the most violent crimes in America? Men. Must be because they are so calm and collected and never let their emotions get the best of them. Go spout your...

Re read what you just said. Men are naturally more aggressive. Which would mean it is a masculine trait. Masculinity: having qualities or appearance traditionally associated with men, especially strength and aggressiveness. So if aggressiveness is associated with men. It is a masculine...

Provide me with a study that shows women allow their emotions to rule their actions.

I know why men have more test and more aggressiveness. The other guy is the one saying "getting into fights is a sign of Low T". In fact, Myles is obviously on a ton of extra T anyway, there is no chance he has low t.

If men control their emotions so well. Why do we constantly see high T individuals flying into fits of rage and murdering or assaulting people? At a much higher rate than females.

So you are agreeing with the other guy and saying Myles Garrett is a low T feminine individual since he attacked the guy in a fit of rage? The prisons are filled with low T individuals because they can't control their emotions and get aggravated? The highest T individuals in America are watching...

So explain why there are so many more males committing non premeditated crimes?

This has been the case since the beginning of time. You think the Alpha Homo Erectus or early Homo Sapien Sapiens were not aggressive?

No, but I don't think people need to change how they act because a small portion of the population(the disabled) may copy them.

Are you kidding me? Look at the stats of violent crimes. Who commits more of them? Which *** is the prison loaded with? Must be because men are so calm and collected. LMFAO!! I shouldn't have to tell an adult, that "being guided by emotion" is not a female quality...

Well then. I guess we are done here. You know you are wrong and just don't want to admit. Everyone with a working brain knows Alphas lose their cool on a general basis. I should have ended this debate when you made the absurd comment that attacking someone is a womanly trait. LOL!!

I gave you one example. You want me to go and document hundreds of instances in which Alphas "lose their head"?

I just did.

So since your ridiculous pseudo-intellectual definition of alpha was called out. You are trying to change the subject of the debate. Makes sense. I will entertain this ridiculous question though. How about when Alā’ ad-Dīn Muhammad had Ghengis khans emissaries arrested because he was offended...