Search results

Rankings will help us win the coastal though. If we didn't have the highest ranked class 2 years ago we would have had no chance of winning the coastal. I agree wtih the rest of your points though.

Their talent exceeds pretty much everybody they play which is the point. They are about to land the number 1 SF and 2 PG in the league this year.

They have the second longest active NCAA streak behind Kansas. Tied for longest active elite 8 streak. They are clearly one of, if not the premier basketball team in the nation.

100% agree. Facts.

Ohhh I see what your saying. Nah I agree. I thought you meant like right this second we can go out and start scooping up Duke basketball kids by saying we are as good academically as them.

I agree. I think we should. Obviously we can't compete with UNC, Duke, UVA, and schools like that academically, but we could beat out UF, UGA, schools like that for kids if they care about academics. Look at John Mack. The guy played football for Duke back in the day and has a higher net worth...

Yes, I am saying those classes were just high ranking because they had so many kids. Average recruit ranking is what matters. You are saying average recruit ranking isn't as important.

No, I never heard that story lol. That is not really true. There are tons of schools that picked up large classes. 7 schools had classes ranked over 91% and only 2 of them had less than 24 kids in that class. Both of those teams (Auburn and OSU) didn't need big classes to begin with. So your...

The reason they are so good at Lacrosse is because there is no Pro Lacrosse(or if there is they get paid barely anything). So the top lacrosse kids in the nation all just try to use it to go to the best schools they can get into. So they can end up making tons of money off their academics. Its...

How often do you see teams with high average rankings that are far away from the scholarship limit? I will give you a hint, it is very very rare. Average recruiting ranking is the one that matters. Your massive "IF" is a lot less likely where teams need 25 kids, but they only settle for 13 kids...

WTF are you talking about. Every playoff team has had 5 stars on it.

No it isn't. If I only need 14 kids this class and I sign 4 5 stars, 7 4 stars and 3 3 stars. That is a better class than someone that signed 1 5 star, 4 4 stars and 30 3 stars even though 247 would say the second class is the higher rated one. Average player ranking is by far the most...

Its because people want to be able to use it as an excuse "why rankings don't matter". They want to be able to point to that class and say "SEE RANKINGS MEAN NOTHING". Then when you poke holes in their theory they don't want to hear it because they know they have nothing else to fall back on.

We were the 13th ranked class if you go by average recruit ranking.