Search results

  1. OriginalCanesCanesCanes

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    Four losses would really be bad, but it was just a discussion on the usage of floor versus ceiling. When someone says 8–4 is the ceiling, that doesn’t sound right. If 8-4 is the ceiling, we may as well fire him now. That’s all I was trying to get at. Unless I just didn’t understand his post...
  2. OriginalCanesCanesCanes

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    yeah I’m not disagreeing with that, I’m saying that I think what you meant to say was that at worst he has to have a record of 8-4 which would mean that is his floor not his ceiling
  3. OriginalCanesCanesCanes

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    You mean our floor?
  4. OriginalCanesCanesCanes

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    This is genius level work right here. Getting the Jeffersons in on this, this is just next level posting.
  5. OriginalCanesCanesCanes

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    I should have, and the lawn truck with that crayon sign - I should’ve mentioned that also
  6. OriginalCanesCanesCanes

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    Typical @NicKane post: And statistics aren’t CashManureCane? I guess you weren’t here for the Goldy/NoD years when they would throw out some meaningless statistics to try and fool us that NoD was good at his job! Lmao but us with eyes, especially us who played the game saw right through that...
  7. OriginalCanesCanesCanes

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    No thanks, Ethenic
  8. OriginalCanesCanesCanes

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    So wait, what is being said here? Just scanning through this laborious word salad, that OP’s analysis is inherently flawed and Manny was not a very good DC from 2016-2018? Based on the “eye test” Or am I misinterpreting my cursory scan?
Back
Top